‘The Beckham Experiment,’ the highly-anticipated book by Sports Illustrated senior writer Grant Wahl hit bookstores this week. It provides an in-depth look at David Beckham’s two-year stint with the LA Galaxy, recapping a tumultuous period for the player, his team and Major League Soccer.

Beckham was introduced by the Galaxy to much fanfare in 2007. The project was an experiment from the start and Wahl provides an inside view of some of the events that made it happen. How did the Beckham experiment fare? From a financial perspective, just fine. Record crowds flocked to Galaxy games (as long as Beckham was with the team, of course) and bought No. 23 Galaxy jerseys, resulting in a terrific monetary windfall for the team and the league. But from nearly every other perspective, the experiment was a disaster. The Galaxy were hopelessly mismanaged and ill-equipped to deal with a player (much less a “brand”) of Beckham’s star power. The team performed dismally on the field, failing to make the playoffs in both of Beckham’s seasons. More importantly, Beckham’s presence did not raise the profile of soccer in the U.S. Television ratings for MLS games remain downright microscopic (the Scrabble All-Star Championship had better ratings than Beckham’s MLS debut). Despite sell-out crowds in Toronto and Seattle (and next year, Philadelphia) average attendance at MLS games has trailed off. Mainstream media coverage is just as elusive as it was before Beckham, if not more so.
Of course, we do not need to read Wahl’s book to provide us this information. It is painfully obvious to anybody who follows the league. But ‘The Beckham Experiment’ tells us exactly where MLS went wrong. The book is not so much about Beckham or even the Galaxy, but about the preeminent professional soccer league in North America. In this, it appears to be the first of its kind. But what it tells us about the league should cause alarm bells at MLS headquarters.
MLS executives insisted that unlike its predecessor (the NASL) it was fully-equipped to handle Beckham and everything that came with him, figuratively and literally. Asked why the Beckham experiment would be more successful over the long term than Pele’s foray with the New York Cosmos, “the word you heard was infrastructure,” Wahl writes. But MLS, with its “single entity business model”, was so obsessed to not repeat the mistakes of its predecessor, that by the time of Beckham’s arrival it had essentially micromanaged itself into near oblivion. Infrastructure or not, the LA Galaxy simply did not have the resources to integrate Beckham. This was partly due to managerial dysfunction (Alexi Lalas and Tim Leiweke took turns feuding with Beckham’s management company and with each other), poor coaching (Frank Yallop and, more egregiously, Ruud Gullit) but largely due to league rules. With the most recognizable athlete on the planet in tow, the team was forced to fly coach and stay in crummy hotels. Due to a strict salary cap, it was not permitted to sign any players that might improve the squad. MLS’ refusal to honor FIFA international dates meant the Galaxy were without Beckham and Donovan (their two best players, by far) for key games.
The league’s salary cap also took its toll on team morale. With Beckham and Donovan earning seven-figures and most role players earning in the low fives, it created a culture that Wahl compares to a third world social economy (tiny upper class, sizeable lower class, no middle class to speak of). Many players with the Galaxy and elsewhere in MLS are essentially semi-pros, forced to hold down second jobs and keep roommates. Integrating them with the likes of David Beckham into a cohesive unit would likely be beyond the means of just about anybody, least of all Frank Yallop or Ruud Gullit (or Alexi Lalas).
Then there were other bush league aspects of MLS that may not have been the result of its salary cap but cast doubt on all the talk about infrastructure. When Beckham entered the league in 2007, five of MLS’ 13 teams had fake grass fields, a situation one member of the Galaxy compared to “Eric Clapton showing up and playing a Fisher Price guitar.” MLS officiating was–and still is–atrocious and quickly became the scapegoat for Beckham’s pent up frustrations. (Wahl recounts one particularly out-of-character episode from a game at RFK Stadium).
Worse, the Galaxy’s schedule was stretched to the breaking point by a myriad of exhibition games that were put on to showcase its biggest star and further pad its coffers. Without the adequate roster depth (due again to the salary cap) its players faced burnout or injury.
Further dooming the Beckham experiment was its namesake being recalled into the English national team by new coach Fabio Capello. Wahl does not mention this in the book, but the Galaxy signed Beckham believing his national team days to be behind him. The travel quickly became overbearing and by the end of the 2008 season, Beckham had let himself get out of shape.
No surprise then that Beckham soon began to seek an exit from MLS, though the Englishman also played a sizable role in The Experiment’s failure. Wahl recounts his by now well-publicized falling out with Donovan, but also shows Becks to be surprisingly tone deaf and ineffectual as a leader and captain. So much for being an ambassador of the sport.
For hardcore U.S. soccer fans, this stuff is catnip. But casual fans of the game, to say nothing of fans of Beckham the pop culture icon, will be disappointed with ‘The Beckham Experiment.’ For them, the book breaks no new ground, offering up at best a few footnotes to Beckham’s legend.
But its greatest service is to MLS. The book demonstrates how, far from having the proper “infrastructure,” the league was unprepared and ill-equipped for his Beckness. It forged ahead anyway, because as Galaxy owner Philip Anschutz says in the book, “We need to do this for the league, because if we’re ever going to expand our ratings and our audience and get credibility in our country, we’re going to need star to break through.”
Wrong, and wrong. MLS doesn’t need a “star” like Beckham. It needs a quality product that the country’s existing base of soccer fans can take seriously. It has handcuffed its clubs, preventing them from building the type of professional environment the sport needs and deserves. Only if it removes the shackles and allows full professionalism to take hold, will it develop the credibility it so desperately seeks. Then and only then can a star like Beckham bring it to the next level. But that interim step is a big one. And the league needs to let it happen.
Surely, Don Garber and the other suits at MLS headquarters will read the book if they haven’t already. But will they get its message?





"It needs a quality product that the country's existing base of soccer fans can take seriously." I just want to add that when non-soccer fans tell me they don't care to explore the MLS, they often say it's because they think it's a minor league. I think if MLS could do a better job of earning the respect of the international soccer community, it would have an effect far beyond existing soccer fans.
This makes me wonder if the author did his homework at all. The salary cap is the precise reason the MLS does provide a quality product for its fans. The reason the NASL failed was because they had no salary cap and all the big teams grabbed the few stars and none of the smaller teams could compete. The Beckham Experiment has not be a success, I think we can all agree, but removing the salary cap would be the worst mistake. Soccer is not big enough yet in the US where people will follow small market teams even if they are never competitive like they do in MLB. Anyone who’s ever rooted for a small market team in MLB knows the true benefit of a salary cap. Dispite the negative tone of this article, MLS is growing and improving each year. Are they the perfect league? No, but the fundamentals are strong.
Maybe not removing the salary cap altogether, but surely it needs to be raised significantly? MLS is supposed to be a professional league but having players on $17K salaries undercuts this. So does making teams travel commercial when many teams can (and want to) pay for charters. The league says this keeps the playing field level but not when a team like the Galaxy has to travel twice as much as the others due to its exhibition schedule. Ditto for teams in SuperLiga and CONCACAF Champions Leagues and the like.
As an MLS season ticket holder, the LAST thing I would want to see is a significant change or removal of the cap. Doing this will quickly set the MLS on the path of the failed XFL and NASL. Right now, every game I watch in the MLS is competitive. No cap means LA builds a team of super stars around Beckham and no one else has a chance. The league gave us the "Beckham Rule" when he came. LA knew of the challenges and they chose to give it a try anyway. The rest of the league needs not to be ruined because LA can't dominate. As soon as you start making exceptions for teams like LA (whether it's flight benefits or whatever), if it's something not every team can afford you start tilting the attraction of one team over the other. Let's not forget that right from the start, Beckham gave a half assed effort and looked like he's just going through the motions with no real passion. Then look at a player in a similar situation such as Schelotto in Columbus and you'll see that international stars can shine and be successful in the MLS. Unlike the story suggests, I do not feel blame for the Beckham failure falls mainly on the MLS at all.
Nathaniel- the MLS was not ready for Beckham, period. However removing the cap and changing the rules the league was built on to keep the playing field level is not the answer. What they need to do is focus on the real problems at hand — such as the officiating and self promotion. Beckham should go back to the EPL if he wants to roll in his money and act like an arrogant super star. He knew where the MLS was at before he signed the deal. It's too late now if the league is not glitzy enough for him. The MLS is expanding and growing because of the way it's set up and doesn't need people like Beckham if they can't appreciate this.
The good thing about the MLS is that all the teams are competitive with each other unlike the EPL, Bundesliga, La Liga and Serie A. Unless you are a fan of Chelsea or Manchester United etc you start every season knowing that you have no chance of winning a championship and you judge a successful season by whether you are able to avoid relegation. In MLS all fans start the new season knowing that if things 'Fall right' for their team there is a good chance their team may win something. We also need to keep in mind that we want our league's main goal to be developing good young American talent. And there are many examples that in that area they are not doing a bad job. Go Crew :)
Yeah but don't you guys realize that the product on the field, the game itself (to say nothing of the refereeing) is nowhere near as good as it could and should be? I'm not trying to condone Beckham's behavior, or the way he gave up on the Galaxy (and no he obviously did not know what he was getting himself involved with) but at some point MLS is going to have to grow beyond what is essentially a semipro league. Yes, MLS is expanding but I can't help but wonder if the interest in places like Toronto and Seattle is not due in large part to it being a novelty act. MLS had pretty big crowds when it arrived in other cities. Fine, don't eliminate the salary cap outright. But for God's sake increase it a bit so you don't have to pay people $17K a season and force them to work second jobs. The players deserve that much.
DB has been good for the MLS regardless.
I wish I understood a little more about this. I’ve been to a number of weblogs today wanting to find information and facts, almost all the places I have visited I’ve found the comments section has become a slanging match. It isn’t really the sort of thing young ladies deal with, therefore i had been wanting somebody right here could really be of assistance?